He Was Wounded
WOUNDS, according to the definition of the surgeon, are divisions of the soft parts of the body by a mechanical force applied externally, and they are classified by the different characters as (1) contused, (2) lacerated, (3) penetrating, (4) perforating, and (5) incised wounds. It is remarkable that in the simple statement “He was wounded.” Isaiah 53:5, there is included each kind of wound, as we may readily see from the examination of the Scripture records concerning the suffering of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I. The Contused Wound
A wound produced by a blunt instrument. Such would result from a blow by the rod, as foretold in Micah 5:1, “They shall smite the Judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek.” Matthew 27:30
2. The Lacerated Wound
A wound produced by a tearing instrument. Laceration of the tissues was the result of scourging; and scourging had become a fine art among the Romans at the time of our Lord’s submission to its infliction. The Roman scourge was a many-tailed lash, each thong tipped with metal or ivory, so that, in the hands of a cruel expert, the sufferer might truthfully say, “The plowers plowed upon My back: they made long their furrows.” Psalm 129:3 The torture, the laceration, and the consequent loss of blood, often resulted in the death of the victim; but scourging, while part of our Lord’s sufferings, was not to be the means of His death. Thus the prophetic word of Isaiah 50:6; “I gave My back to the smiters,” finds its fulfillment, as recorded in Matthew 27:26 and in John 19:1, where we read: “Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged Him,” and let us remember that upon His back, thus lacerated, the cross was laid as He went forth to the place of Calvary.
3. The Penetrating Wound
A deep wound caused by a sharp, pointed instrument. This we have exemplified in the wounds upon the head produced by the crown of thorns. The Jerusalem thorn, from which that “victor’s crown” was platted, bore spicules four inches long, and, as the soldiers pressed down the cruel diadem upon His head (Matthew 27:29; John 19:2), a circlet of wounds ensued, wounds which were deepened by the blow of the reed when they smote Him on the head (Matthew 27:30).
4. The Perforating Wound
From the Latin word meaning “to pierce through.” “They pierced My hands and My feet.” Psalm 22:16 The iron spikes were driven between the bones, separating but not breaking these. Crucifixion was not practiced as a means of capital punishment by the Jews, and the words must therefore have puzzled even the writer of the Psalm, but at that early date God was thereby “signifying what death He should die,” John 2:33 for to Him, Who knows the end from the beginning, the Roman subjugation of the Jews at the time of Messiah’s advent, and His “cutting off” by the exquisitely painful death of crucifixion, were all foreknown. Yea, and to our Lord by anticipation and at last in fearful reality the “decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem” Luke 9:31 was a matter of perfect knowledge. The prophetic question in Zechariah 13:6; “What are these wounds in Thine hands?” was ever before Him, and thus we can truly sing— “T’was love that nailed Thee to the tree Or iron ne’er had bound Thee.”
5. The Incised Wound
A cut produced by a sharp edged instrument. “But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced His side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.” John 19:34 This wound was inflicted after the death of the Lord Jesus, inflicted by the practiced hand of the Roman soldier to make certain that whatever vestige of life was present would be extinguished, but while it did not cause death in His case it is an assurance to all men that death had actually occurred, and it is also a fulfillment of the Scripture which saith, “They shall look on Him whom they pierced.” John 19:37
And from the wound (so large that Thomas could have thrust his hand into it,) “came there out blood and water. And he that saw it bare record, and his record is true.” John 19:34-35 This wonderful sight awakened surprise and deep interest in John and may surely engage our attention also, namely the water that flowed from the pericardium and the blood that flowed from the heart. The pericardium is a closed sac encasing the heart and lubricated by a small amount of fluid (about a teaspoonful) to facilitate the motion of the heart. How could John, it may be asked, distinguish such a small quantity of water? In answer, let me quote a significant statement from a standard work (Mallory and Wright’s Pathological Technique): “The normal amount (of the pericardial fluid) is about a teaspoon, but it may be increased to 100 cc. (24 teaspoonfuls) where death agony is prolonged.” Here then is a confirmation by scientists of the mute testimony borne by “the water” to the intense suffering of our Lord Jesus Christ. And what shall we say to the fact that, contrary to nature, blood flowed from One Who had died? Is it not to show that in death, “He vanquished death and did not see corruption?” Thus the last wound, the last indignity offered to the Body prepared for Him, proclaims both purification and redemption for “The very spear that pierced His side drew forth the blood to save.” Israel is described in Isaiah 1:6 as exhibiting to God’s eye “From the sole of the foot even unto the head… wounds,” and our Lord Jesus Christ, in submitting to this perfection of wounding from head to foot, was made in one sense like unto His brethren and “perfect through sufferings.” Hebrews 2:10
May the contemplation of these wounds, whereby His body was broken and His blood was shed, deepen our love for Him Who “was wounded in the house of My friends,” Zechariah 13:6 “wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for our iniquities,” Isaiah 53:5 and cause each of us, like Thomas, to worship and acclaim Him as “My Lord and My God.” John 20:28.